Welcome to Agentic Academic Integrity thatassembles the evidence before anyone argues about it.

Most integrity concerns never enter the system, because the formal route costs a week the professor does not have. Risely's agents assemble the file, rank the options against the department's own precedent, and run both clocks. The professor decides the outcome.

See it on your policyThe office

Case file · unauthorized collaboration

assembling

Both submissions attached

each version brings its own edit history

Timeline built

who wrote what and when

History checked

no earlier case on either record

Policy clause located

the collaboration rule this syllabus states

The student answers

the reply attaches a study-group instruction from the syllabus

policy options · with precedent

top

Grade penalty on the assignment

used where the work was substantially copied

·

Education-first resolution

used for a first case of this type

·

Referral to the conduct office

reserved for a second finding

Response window

notice pending

Both parties see the same dates. The professor is on a clock too, and Risely's agents keep it in front of everyone.

evidence and history assembledoptions ranked by what the institution already didthe professor decides the outcome

Raising a concern costs one sentence.

The professor describes what happened in plain English. Risely's agents open the case, pull both submissions with their edit histories, and draft the notice for the professor to send.

What the professor typed

"Two lab analyses came in almost identical and I would like this handled properly."

·Case openedon the institution's process, not in a hallway
·Evidence pulledboth submissions and their edit histories
·Notice draftedwaiting for the professor to send it

the professor's part was one sentence

Most concerns never enter the system because the formal route costs a week. Make the route cost a sentence and the cases that used to vanish start arriving.

Every option carries what the department already did.

Risely's agents put comparable closed cases beside each policy option, so a first-time lapse meets the path the department has used before rather than whatever mood the semester happens to be in.

Comparable cases and how they closed

this department

last springFirst case · shared lab write-upeducation-first
two terms agoFirst case · shared problem seteducation-first
last yearSecond case · same studentconduct referral

An outcome nobody can compare is an outcome nobody can defend. Risely's agents put the department's own history beside each option before anyone chooses one.

Both sides end up holding a record.

The accused student gets a dated notice, the evidence being relied on, and a window to answer. The professor gets the clause, the precedent, and a decision that stands up in April. A hallway conversation gives neither of them any of that.

What each side holds when it closes

The accused student

  • · a dated notice
  • · the evidence being relied on
  • · a window to reply
  • · the reply on the file

The professor

  • · the policy clause that applies
  • · what comparable cases did
  • · a decision on the record

A private conversation leaves the student nothing to appeal with and the professor nothing to stand on. The same file gives both of them something.

A second case finds the first one.

Cases settled quietly teach the institution nothing. Risely's agents file each one where the next reader looks, so a pattern that crosses two departments stops being invisible to both.

Prior integrity record · this student

this case · chemistryopened this term
one earlier case · historyclosed education-first last spring

a pattern the second department could never have seen

Cases settled privately teach the institution nothing. A case filed where the next one looks is what turns a repeated pattern into something anybody can act on.

One thing moves. The file re-ranks.

A reply lands, an earlier case surfaces, a policy revision takes effect. Any of them changes which outcome the precedent supports, and every one runs the same way.

  1. The student answers the notice

    the syllabus's own study-group line is attached

  2. The file takes the reply in

    the timeline redraws around it

  3. The options re-rank

    an education-first path moves to the top

  4. The professor picks the outcome

    with the precedent sitting beside it

  5. The record closes where the next case looks

    a second concern would find this one

Agentic Academic Integrity never works alone.

Faculty Assistantwhere the concern first gets raisedCase Management & Sanctionstakes the referral this file writesInformation Literacy Instructionteaches the citation practice first cases miss

see the full faculty office →

What changes, and how it runs.

Cases that used to vanish get filed

The route costs a sentence rather than a week.

Outcomes stop turning on the semester's mood

Precedent sits beside every option before anyone chooses.

Both sides hold the same record

A dated notice, the evidence, and the reply on the file.

The technical read

Connects read-only to your LMS, SIS, and conduct system to start

A professor decides every outcome

Every action lands on an append-only log

SOC 2 Type IIFERPAGDPR

Runs alongside what you have. Nothing rips out.

Schedule a demo