Welcome to Agentic Grant Finding thatreads a forty-two-page solicitation end to end.

The solicitation that fits the faculty perfectly is 42 pages long, and the requirement that sinks the proposal is one sentence on page 31. Risely's agents read every call the day it posts, and the PI decides every pursuit.

NSF 24-570 · CAREER · posted today

reading · page 0 of 42

·Departmental letter · 2 pp. max
·Data management plan
·Mentoring plan · postdoc in the budget
·Budget within the $500,000 cap

Match

Fit 91% for one PI's program, and the deadline works with the teaching load.

Clock

Internal deadline set 10 days ahead of the sponsor's.

The match runs the day the call posts.

Risely's agents read every feed end to end and weigh each call against the faculty's programs, their award history, and their actual load. The fit reaches the right PI while the deadline is still far away.

The match reads today's calls

reading

·Early-career programfits one PI's program · 91%
·Instrumentation callno lab on campus runs this method
·Workforce partnershipfits a center, flagged to its director
·Clinical supplementno active parent award

Passes get a reason too, so nobody wonders whether a call was read at all.

Every requirement becomes a row with an owner.

Federal prose hides obligations in subordinate clauses. Each one gets extracted into a checklist row with an owner and a date, so the mentoring plan gets written in week two instead of discovered in the final read-through.

Page 31 becomes a row with an owner

the solicitation, page 31

"…proposals supporting postdoctoral researchers must include a mentoring plan…"

Mentoring plan

owner · the PI

required because the postdoc is in the budget · due in week two

The sentence that used to surface in the final read-through now has an owner from day one.

The internal clock leads the sponsor's.

The internal deadline sits 10 days ahead of the sponsor's, and routing, QA, and upload all schedule backward from it. The office meets the real deadline with margin instead of adrenaline.

The office sets two deadlines on purpose

Internal deadline

10 days ahead

Sponsor deadline

the real one

Routing, the final QA, and the upload all live inside those 10 days. The office schedules backward from its own clock and meets the sponsor's with room.

Nothing that fits slips past unread.

Offices that triage on stolen time miss matches and never know it. Every call gets read, every pass gets a reason, and every live pursuit sits on one board the research office can actually see.

The live pursuits

Early-career programstarted · 60 days on the clock
Center renewaldocuments in draft
Workforce partnershipwith the center director to decide
Instrumentation callpassed · reason on file

Triage used to run on stolen time. Now the stolen time is the part that stopped.

One call posts. The match re-runs.

A new solicitation, an amended deadline, a revised program notice. Any of them changes who should hear about what, and every one runs the same way.

  1. A call posts overnight

    one of the day's new solicitations

  2. The match runs

    program, history, and load all weigh in

  3. The requirements extract

    each of the 14 rows gets an owner

  4. The clock sets

    the internal deadline leads by 10 days

  5. The PI decides early

    60 days on the clock instead of 20

What changes, and how it runs.

The right calls get found

Every feed read end to end, every day, with a reason for every pass.

Proposals start on time

The pursuit begins with 60 days on the clock instead of 20.

The page-31 trap gets an owner

The requirement that sinks proposals lands on the checklist in week one.

The technical read

Connects read-only to your sponsor feeds, grants system, and faculty profiles to start

The PI decides every pursuit

Every action lands on an append-only log

SOC 2 Type IIFERPAGDPR

Runs alongside what you have. Nothing rips out.