Welcome to Agentic Routing & Approvals thatmaps the approval chain the day a proposal starts.

Proposals die in routing more often than in review: the chair is at a conference, the conflict form was never started, and all of it collides late on a Friday. Risely's agents map the chain on day one and keep every signature moving.

Routing · internal deadline in 10 days

mapping the chain

Chair

signed Tuesday · reminded once, gently

Dean's office

in queue · their SLA is 3 days, 6 remain

COI forms

both investigators filed · one disclosure routed for review

Sponsored programs

final check scheduled the day the dean signs

Days of margin against the internal deadline

The chain is knowable on day one.

Two investigators mean two disclosures. The department names its chair, the college names its dean, and the sponsor names its certifications. Risely's agents derive the whole chain from the proposal facts the day the proposal starts.

The chain reads from the facts

Two investigators on the proposaltwo COI disclosures
The department it runs inthe chair's signature
The college above itthe dean's approval
The sponsor's certificationssponsored programs' final check

The routing chain is knowable on day one. Most offices discover it on day last.

Signatures run beside the science.

Every approver receives the request in week one with the real deadline attached, so the dean's office treats the proposal as a scheduled task and the conflict review gets the week it needs.

Two tracks, one calendar

The science · aims, methods, narrative

The signatures · started the same day

The COI disclosure that needs committee review gets its week, because it started in week one.

Proposals die in routing more often than in review. Parallel lanes are the whole cure.

Only the stall gets escalated.

Approvers inside their own turnaround get left alone. The one signature that stalls escalates with its reason and the days remaining, which keeps escalation meaning something.

The escalation budget, spent well

Chairsigned after one gentle reminder
Dean's officeinside their SLA · left alone
One disclosurestalled · escalated with the reason and the days left

Escalating everything trains everyone to ignore it. Escalating one named signature, with days still left, works.

Submission day is an upload.

Sponsored programs' final check lands on a routed, signed, internally consistent package. The office clicks upload with margin to spare, and the Friday collision never happens.

The last day runs without drama

·Routed and signedevery approval on the record
·Internally consistentthe package agrees with itself
·Cleared for uploadsponsored programs' check, done calmly

The final 48 hours used to collide with all of it at once. Now they hold one calm upload.

One approver stalls. The route re-plans.

A travelling chair, a swamped dean's office, a disclosure that needs committee time. Any of them threatens the deadline, and every one runs the same way.

  1. An approver goes quiet

    the chair is at a conference

  2. The stall surfaces early

    while the margin is still days wide

  3. A gentle nudge goes out

    with the real deadline attached

  4. The escalation names one thing

    the missing signature and nothing else

  5. The internal deadline holds

    submission day stays an upload

What changes, and how it runs.

Proposals stop dying in routing

Every approver sees the request on day one.

The conflict review gets its week

Started in week one instead of found in the last 48 hours.

Submission day holds one calm upload

The final check lands on a signed, consistent package.

The technical read

Connects read-only to your grants system, routing forms, and directory to start

Every approval stays with its approver

Every action lands on an append-only log

SOC 2 Type IIFERPAGDPR

Runs alongside what you have. Nothing rips out.